According to GSA guidelines, contractors must expect new mandatory language that limits vendor control over how agencies use, modify, and redistribute AI outputs, models, and derived data. This opening assessment addresses scope: the Government is seeking rights to operationally reuse outputs; audit model provenance; and require provenance metadata, documentation, and patching obligations. The change affects contract clauses (warranties, indemnities, deliverable definitions), IP terms (rights in technical data and software), and security requirements. This paragraph references GSA, SBA, and FAR practices: GSA has circulated draft AI contract terms that would require broader government usage rights, the SBA is flagging impacts to small business negotiating leverage, and FAR precedent on data rights (FAR 52.227 series and agency-specific supplements) will guide interagency implementation. Contractors should map which solutions deliver models or only outputs, enumerate third-party components, and calculate costs for additional controls, licensing amendments, and potential loss of commercial exclusivity. Expect agencies to insist on clear artifact inventories, export-control reviews, and enhanced record-keeping when contracting for systems that include generative AI.