What Did FedRAMP Require for Cisco SD-WAN Under Emergency Directive 26-03?
FedRAMP required Marketplace providers to review ED 26-03, identify Cisco SD-WAN systems, apply Cisco updates, report status, and submit supplemental materials by Feb. 27, 2026.
AI-assisted and automatically checked against the linked primary sources.
What actions were required under ED 26-03?
Important note
If a provider found any indication of compromise or anomalous behavior, FedRAMP directed it to follow the FedRAMP Incident Communication Procedures, including reporting to CISA US-CERT and agency customers.
Process
- 1
Review ED 26-03
FedRAMP required providers to review the emergency directive to understand which systems were affected.
- 2
Identify in-scope Cisco SD-WAN systems
Providers had to determine whether any affected Cisco SD-WAN systems existed inside the FedRAMP-authorized boundary.
- 3
Collect logs and apply updates
For affected systems, FedRAMP said providers should collect logs and apply Cisco-provided updates to the CVEs identified in the directive.
- 4
Perform hunt and hardening actions
Providers should carry out the hunt and hardening activities recommended in the supplemental guidance.
- 5
Submit reporting and notify customers
Providers had to upload supplemental information, notify agency customer AO or ISSO contacts, and complete the response form by 5:00 PM ET on February 27, 2026.
- FedRAMP required Marketplace cloud service providers to respond to CISA Emergency Directive 26-03.
- The directive required review, system identification, patching with Cisco-provided updates, and supplemental reporting.
- Providers with no in-scope affected systems could skip directly to the final reporting step.
- The February 27, 2026 deadline was set by CISA, not FedRAMP.
Review the directive, confirm whether any Cisco SD-WAN systems are in scope, and complete the FedRAMP response form and related notifications if required.
Sources & Citations
Related Articles
How Can the False Claims Act Expose Federal Contractors Beyond the Federal Level?
DOJ, FAR rules, and cost principles show FCA risk can extend to state, local, and governmentwide consequences, plus disclosure duties and exclusion exposure.
Read more →How Will FedRAMP's 2026 Overhaul Change Cloud Authorization for Contractors?
FedRAMP now centers reusable certification packages, recognized assessors, significant-change notifications, and ongoing monitoring, with key dates in 2027.
Read more →What Are the Contracting Implications of New Quantum-Resistant Security Requirements?
Federal work now points toward PQC-ready design, FedRAMP module documentation, and validated cryptographic modules in some certification paths.
Read more →