What Did FedRAMP Require for Cisco SD-WAN Under Emergency Directive 26-03?
FedRAMP required Marketplace providers to review ED 26-03, identify Cisco SD-WAN systems, apply Cisco updates, report status, and submit supplemental materials by Feb. 27, 2026.
AI-assisted and automatically checked against the linked primary sources.
What actions were required under ED 26-03?
Important note
If a provider found any indication of compromise or anomalous behavior, FedRAMP directed it to follow the FedRAMP Incident Communication Procedures, including reporting to CISA US-CERT and agency customers.
Process
- 1
Review ED 26-03
FedRAMP required providers to review the emergency directive to understand which systems were affected.
- 2
Identify in-scope Cisco SD-WAN systems
Providers had to determine whether any affected Cisco SD-WAN systems existed inside the FedRAMP-authorized boundary.
- 3
Collect logs and apply updates
For affected systems, FedRAMP said providers should collect logs and apply Cisco-provided updates to the CVEs identified in the directive.
- 4
Perform hunt and hardening actions
Providers should carry out the hunt and hardening activities recommended in the supplemental guidance.
- 5
Submit reporting and notify customers
Providers had to upload supplemental information, notify agency customer AO or ISSO contacts, and complete the response form by 5:00 PM ET on February 27, 2026.
- FedRAMP required Marketplace cloud service providers to respond to CISA Emergency Directive 26-03.
- The directive required review, system identification, patching with Cisco-provided updates, and supplemental reporting.
- Providers with no in-scope affected systems could skip directly to the final reporting step.
- The February 27, 2026 deadline was set by CISA, not FedRAMP.
Sources & Citations
Ready to Win Government Contracts?
Use Gov Contract Finder to discover relevant federal opportunities and prepare stronger bids.
Related Articles
What should contractors verify in “FAR 4.703 Policy”?
A primary-source checklist for reviewing “FAR 4.703 Policy” without relying on unsupported legacy claims.
Read more →What should contractors verify in “SP 800-92, Guide to Computer Security Log Management and Use Logging on Business Systems | CISA”?
A primary-source checklist for reviewing “SP 800-92, Guide to Computer Security Log Management and Use Logging on Business Systems | CISA” without relying on unsupported legacy claims.
Read more →What should contractors verify in “SP 1353, NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: Quick-Start Guide for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for CSF…”?
A primary-source checklist for reviewing “SP 1353, NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: Quick-Start Guide for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for CSF…” without relying on unsupported legacy claims.
Read more →